Burberry’s creative director, Christopher Bailey, thinks that plain pantyhose are boring and bare legs in winter – just stupid. In this fashion show his models wear rhombus (or snake) print tights.
But is this on purpose that patterns are all crooked? Or, even better, one leg crooked and one leg straight? At first I thought he was trying to go for the candy cane effect, but I now think that someone was just simply in a big rush getting dressed. I’d love to hear your opinions.
I believe that the models were in a HUGE rush and got their tights twisted. It doesn’t look any good in my opinion.
Not sure, but there’s no consistency in the 3 photos in the straightness of the pattern. My guess is they were told to wear them, and put them on with little or no instruction.
As far as I know these young girls, they have no clue – because they dont wear PH in their daily lives 🙂