Is there such thing as a wrong shade of pantyhose? I found this photo on a forum. This woman is wearing pantyhose that looks slightly greener than her own skin tone. Isn’t it kind of strange? I would imagine it would look much better on a black girl, for example.
Do you agree? I’d be interested to hear your thoughts.
OR COULD THIS BE A COLOR CAST FROM THE GRASS AND TREES?
Update on Dec 4th, 2012 – submitted by Mike
In his comment below he says: ”
I agree with David. Beware of color cast!
Pictures taken in a forest, under trees or with a large area of grass tend to be green, because of the reflection of the sun on the green leaves or the grass like above. In the same idea, pics taken in the snow tend to look bluer because of the reflection of the sky on the snow’s surface. I made a corrected version of this photo, if you’re interested. It’s fairer to judge a picture with the good equilibrium of the color tones.”
He says: “I corrected the yellow cast caused by the sun in the background and the green cast caused by the grass on the foreground. I also lowered the saturation of the colour of the girl’s face, as her face looked pinkish.”
Original Photo
After colour correction
vertical comparison
horizontal comparison
If Mike is right about the colour cast, I’d say that she is actually wearing a good shade of pantyhose judging by the corrected photos. In terms of her skin tone – I think that the poor girl simply got a bit of a sunburn in the summer.
I’ve seen some photos of people tanning through lace fishnet pantyhose in a pattern that looked like someone printed the fabric onto the leg. Let’s just say, it looked very strange.
